|
|
 |
FMLA Newsletter
June 2011—Quarter 2
- New ADAAA Regulations
- Build the ADA Interactive Accommodation Step into Absence Management Processes
- "We Don't Allow That for Other Employees" Doesn't Avoid ADA Accommodation Obligations
- Definitions of"Disability" Vary Greatly
- The Reduced Threshold for "Disability" May Impact Other Employee Leave Rights
- ADA Lawsuits on the Rise
- Supervalu | Jewel Food Stores
- United Airlines
- Sears, Roebuck and Co.
- USERRA & FMLA
- FMLA
- Requiring Doctor Notes for Absences Interferes with FMLA Rights
- Employers Victorious in FMLA Call-In Cases: Lessons to be Learned
February 2011—Quarter 1
- GINA Final Regulations: Absence Management for Employers
- GINA Provisions Relating to Acquisition of Medical Information
- GINA Definitions
- Exceptions to the Acquisition of Genetic Information
- GINA Warning Required
- Information for Employee Leave to Care for a Family Member
- Special Requirements for Job-Related Medical Examinations
- Limitations on Disclosure of Genetic Information
- Reed Group's Response
- FMLA and ADA - Cases of Note
- New DOL Program Likely to Increase Lawsuits
- $3.2 Million Decree . . .
- $8.1 Million Pricetag . . .
- Be Careful What You Promise Employees: equitable estoppel
- No Good (Leave Management) Deed Goes Unpunished
- USERRA Note
- Protections Arise Before an Employee Is Called to Active Duty
- State Leave Laws - Notable Developments
- More California Leave Option
- New D.C. Regulations Effective 11/19/2010
September 2010—Expanded!
- FMLA - Notable Developments
- DOL announces 2011 focus
- DOL clarifies definition of "son or daughter"
- Court Rules: FMLA does not protect an employee no longer qualified for her position
- An FMLA Lesson: supervisor attitudes can create employer liability
- ADA - Cases of Note
- Interactive accommodation process
- Difficulty in access to the workplace
- State Leave Laws - Notable Developments
- Ohio enacts new military families leave
- Connecticut revises crime victims leave law
- New case interpretation purports to expand employee coverage under the Connecticut FMLA
- Ohio employers may deny maternity leave based on uniform minimum service requirement - but beware of Kansas
July 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- STATE LAW CHANGES
June 2009
May 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- STATE LAW CHANGES
April 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- STATE LAW CHANGES
March 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- The Family Leave Insurance Act of 2009
- STATE LAW CHANGES
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Montana
- Nevada
February 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- Family and Medical Leave
Enhancement Act of 2009
- The Airline Flight Crew Technical
Corrections Act
- The Family Fairness Act
- STATE / CITY LAW CHANGES
- Colorado
- Wisconsin
- Connecticut
January 2009
- FEDERAL LAW
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- STATE / CITY LAW CHANGES
- Recent FMLA cases
- Failure to follow employer’s call-in policy
December 2008
- FEDERAL LAW CHANGES
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Family Military Leave
- STATE LAW CHANGES & DEVELOPMENTS
June 2008
- FEDERAL LAW
- Family Leave Insurance Act
- Amendment to the ADA
- STATE LAW CHANGES
- Connecticut
- New Jersey
- Massachusetts
- Ohio
May 2008
- FEDERAL LAW
- Family Leave Insurance Act
- A bill to fix a loophole
- STATE LAW CHANGES
- California
- New Jersey
- Vermont
April 2008
- FEDERAL LAW
- STATE LAW CHANGES
- California
- Colorado
- District of Columbia
- Maine
- New Jersey
- New York
- Washington
|